Posted by
Jackye.O, By the Book on Thursday, January 31, 2008 6:27:55 PM
I am a dyed in the wool, true conservative, even more; I am a far right conservative. I am an Evangelical Christian, and what I believe does color how I vote and who I vote for. I attempt to live by the book, (that is the Bible). I am not ashamed to admit that because the testimony of the Lord is sure, making the simple wise. As I observe our political process I do not cease to be amazed at the number of people who attempt to usurp God’s power and put into the White House who they think should be there.
I listen to Hugh Hewitt and Laura Ingraham and a number of other conservative talk show hosts and I am convinced they are ruining their own popularity because they have begun to look like the liberals, who try to control how everyone thinks. At one time I listened to Michael Savage; until he started sounding so insane I had to turn him off. His ranting and raving and Bush bashing got to be too much. I also would get up early (California time) to listen to Bill Bennett because I liked his show so much, but the Harriet Myers bashing and the Dubai Ports deal were so nauseating I got totally turned off. I have never been a big fan of Hush Hewitt or Laura Ingraham, or Shawn Hannity mainly because they each exude an arrogance I can tolerate only for so long. However they each are leading the way in the fight against anyone running against who they believe should be president. Hewitt went after Mike Huckabee with a vengeance when he won Iowa, Then when things changed in New Hampshire he dropped his violent attempts to crush Huckabee and shifted his attack to John McCain, because he is obvious in his attempts to play God; by bad mouthing Mitt Romney’s opponents he believes he can effect the outcome of the November elections.
Since John McCain won in Florida, Laura Ingraham has been on a one woman crusade to destroy him just as she did with Harriett Myers. Then there is Rush who since I do not listen to him I can not write about him, except to say I have heard he also is out to destroy John McCain. As for Dennis Prager He and Michael Medved are the only two who seem to be somewhat equitable in dealing with all the candidates. Mr. Prager clearly does not like McCain on several issues, but at least acknowledges that you must look at his whole record and not judge him on a handful of key issues. Michael Medved likes McCain, he does not push McCain, but does defends him against unfair attacks and he tries to be fair to the all the other candidates.
Now, I said all this to say that I am no McCain lover; I voted against him in 2000 and have no qualms about admitting that. But this is another day, and I am sick of Washington gridlock. In the past 7 years our legislative branch has hardly done enough to boast about, primarily because of the partisan infighting. John McCain has reached across the aisle and while I do not agree with him on immigration as it was presented to the people in 2006, the people’s voices were loud enough to table that bill and kill it permanently, now he says he has heard the peoples voice, I am willing to give him the benefit of the doubt. As far as campaign finance is concerned John McCain attempted to do something to stop graft and corruption, it did not work, it backfired, but he tried. And then there is the not voting for the Bush tax cuts issue. I remember him not voting for those, I drew the conclusion that he would be Bush’s nemesis for the whole of his presidency and that he did that to spite the president I was blinded by my support for the president. I also remember him saying at the time that he would not agree to tax cuts unless there were spending caps. But still I did not like McCain at that time and so I drew the conclusion that best fit my agenda; he must have be doing that out of spite. Lastly he recently said he thought we should be able to re-import drugs from Canada. Dennis Prager hates that idea, because he feels the best medicines come from the American drug company’s ability to do research, and invent better drugs. Well I have a bone to pick with that, Last year I went to France on vacation, I had saved and planned for that trip for two years, and of course American Airlines lost my luggage for 4 days; I am a heart patient and all my meds were in my luggage. Subsequently I had to find a pharmacy in France to give me the drugs without a prescription. My hotel wrote a note to the local pharmacist and explained my situation. I was able to get all three heart medications with out a problem; however, what stood out the most was the cost. That medicine in America would have cost me $300.00 for a 90 day supply, I was astonished to find that I only had to pay 25 euros for the same amount of medicine which converts to about $40.00. Every medication I take cures one thing and causes another problem. When the drug companies can produce drugs that do not produce other complications, and can reduce the cost somewhat then I will side with Dennis Prager, but until that time I also, being a senior now retired and living on a fixed income, would love it if we could pay the prices the Canadians pay.
I am writing all this from the standpoint of a common citizen, without any powers of persuasion, or a platform to present an agenda, I urge my fellow Republicans to consider whether they want Hillary Clinton, (with Bill we get a twofer), or Barrack Obama, who leans so far to the left he would slide off the edge if the earth were flat, in the White House for the next 4 to 8 years, or on the chance that McCain is our candidate, John McCain who sometimes goes in a different direction but for the bulk of his time in office has been a pretty good conservative. Our culture which is now a sink hole would become a cesspool. Every liberal idea would take root and grow exponentially so that no resemblance of the United States as the founders saw it would remain.